| « prev next » |
Recently read an article of Jeremy about What is the difference between a good product and a good company?.
I like the way it describes the two different company. Below is my extension of the idea, not necessarily what Jeremy wrote in his blog.
This echoes to what on the page 64 of Guy Kawasaki's book Reality Check.
What is your background?
- Engineering (add 5 points)
- Sales (add 5 points)
- Management Consultant (subtracts 5 points)
- Investment Banker (subtracts 5 points)
- Accounting (subtracts 5 points)
- MBA (subtracts 5 points)
Sales can always see arbitrage opportunity but often fail to create value.
They may end up with the two different type of companies. The idea case is a company that can get profit by creating value.
Guy Kawasaki is absolutely about the view of a management consultant (Jack Welch's word: good at giving options but hard to make decisions), investment banking (build the company for wall street, not customers), and accountant. I don't like MBA either (my discussion about MBA).
by Jian Shuo Wang on August 18, 2009 under Books
I do have a question here.
A company's profit-value-preference should have been determined by its "Mission Statement". It is of a company, like constitution of a nation. The founder of a company must have put his personal inclination into the statement. If the ECO's background has an obvious influence on the company's behavior, does a company change its mission statement if it instates a new ECO who has a background different from the predecessor's?
I think most business & industry people has placed the cart before the horse over the past several decades - that is putting Wall Street (e.g. Financiers & bankers) ahead of Main Street (e.g. Engineers & merchants). No wonder only a few big name companies in the U.S. are adding real & lasting value ...
Posted by: Jet So on August 20, 2009 11:12 PM